February 16, 1863, The Charleston Mercury
The laws of nations can not be really laws, until nations join in enforcing them. As things now are, the strong observe or break them, according to their volition or interest, and the weak are their victims. But the other day, in 1856, the great nations of Europe, in solemn council assembled, determined to settle what these laws should be hereafter on certain disputed points; and yet in 1862, but six years after, they submit to their violation, in every form and manner, by the United States. They determined to put an end to paper blockades. They declare precisely what a blockade shall be:
‘Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective – that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of an enemy.’
Dr. JOHNSON’S definition of a blockade – shut up by obstruction – seems to be realized by these words of the Paris Conference. Yet, either from prejudice towards one of the belligerents, or fear of the other, the great European nations which put forth this declaration have totally disregarded it, in the war between the United and the Confederate States. The British Queen’s Solicitor, Sir ROUNDEL PALMER, in debate in the House of Commons, on 7th March, 1862, undertook to state what a blockade was. He said:
‘A bona fide blockade must be by a force sufficient to maintain it on the spot; and there must be a sufficient notification of some kind or other of that blockade. These are the two principles. Whatever may be found in some writers, not now of recent date, it is perfectly clear that we have no exact technical definition of what constitutes a sufficient force. What, from the beginning of this century, has been laid down as the test in this matter? Why in the first place, that of evident danger; and then, that due credit must be given to the judgment of naval officers entrusted with the execution of the service.’
Here is the marvelous retrocession from the declaration of the Paris Conference.
Sir ROUNDEL PALMER was mistaken when he said that is perfectly clear that we have no exact definition of what constitutes a sufficient force. The object of the declaration of the Paris Conference was to do this very thing – to define exactly what shall be a force to constitute a blockade. It lays down that the force must be – and then, to settle what it meant by an effective force, it adds a definition, as follows: ‘That is to say, it must be maintained by a sufficient force [continue reading…]